Content Lexicon.

Head of content

In one line

A senior role responsible for all the content an organisation publishes, and for the people, standards and systems that produce and look after it.

A head of content leads an organisation’s content as a whole: the website, guidance, publications, newsletters, social channels and, increasingly, the words inside its products and services. They set standards, decide priorities, manage the people and budget that produce the content and answer to senior leadership for whether it works. Most combine an editorial or content background with the authority to make decisions that cross departmental lines.

The title is common in media, charities, membership bodies and technology companies, and its scope varies widely. In a small organisation the head of content may be a player-coach who still writes and edits; in a large one they may lead several teams of designers, editors, strategists and channel specialists. Related titles include content director, editor-in-chief and, at board level, chief content officer.

Why an organisation needs a head of content

In many organisations, content is produced in many places and owned in none. Communications runs news and campaigns, digital runs the website, policy writes guidance, fundraising or marketing writes appeals, and each team has its own idea of quality and voice. The result is duplication, contradiction and a website nobody can fix because nobody has the authority to. A head of content gives the entire estate a single senior owner: someone who can decide what gets published and what gets retired, set standards everyone follows and make the case for investment in terms leadership understands.

The role also gives content a voice where decisions are made. Without one, content is often what gets asked for at the end of a project, after the service has been designed and the budget spent. A head of content can argue earlier for the audience, for the cost of maintaining what’s published and for the systems content depends on. The need is usually clearest after a period of growth, a merger or a website rebuild, or when a strategist has set a direction and nobody senior is left to hold it.

How AI changes the role

AI raises the stakes on decisions only a senior content leader can make. When leadership asks whether assistants can cut the content budget, someone needs to answer with evidence about where AI speeds work up and where it adds review, risk and maintenance. When a chatbot starts answering questions in the organisation’s name, its answers are content, and the head of content is often the person accountable for whether they’re accurate, consistent and in the right voice. That draws the role into procurement, risk and governance conversations that used to belong to technology teams.

AI also changes the team a head of content leads. With drafting cheaper, they may move budget and headcount from production towards editing, structuring and checking, and need to make that case before the savings are claimed elsewhere. The bigger danger is volume: when anyone can publish more, the organisation needs someone with the standing to say no. A job description might now ask for experience of leading teams through technological change, setting organisation-wide standards for AI-assisted content and working with legal, data and technology colleagues on risk.

Questions people ask

How is a head of content different from a head of communications?

A head of communications looks after what the organisation wants to say: its reputation, media relations, campaigns and internal messages. A head of content looks after what people need to find, understand and use, including the content that will never feature in a press release, such as guidance, help pages, service information and reference material. Communications sends messages out at particular moments; content has to serve people whenever they arrive. Many organisations need both, and the head of comms title often reflects an older model in which the website was one more channel for announcements.

Should we rename our head of communications?

Only if the remit changes with the name. A new title can be a useful signal: when a head of communications becomes head of content, colleagues start to see the job as looking after everything the organisation publishes, including the guidance and service information that never made the news. A title on its own changes little, though. The role needs the authority, budget and team to match, and communications work, from press enquiries to crisis handling, still needs an owner.

How is a head of content different from a content strategist or content manager?

A strategist sets the direction and a content manager runs the system day to day; a head of content is accountable for both and for the people doing them. In smaller organisations one person may do all three. In larger ones the head of content usually manages strategists, managers and editors, and spends most of their time on priorities, budget, standards and relationships with other senior leaders.

Where should a head of content sit?

In, or close to, the leadership team, whether the role reports to a director of communications, digital or engagement, or to the chief executive. What matters is that the reporting line gives authority across departments. A head of content placed inside a single team will tend to look after that team’s content and little else.

Do we need a chief content officer?

Possibly, if content is a large operation in its own right, with several teams, brands or languages and a budget to match. Chief content officer is the board-level version of the role, found mostly in media businesses and larger companies. Many organisations are better served by a head of content with real authority. The abbreviation doesn’t help either: CCO more often means chief communications officer, which brings back the very confusion the title was meant to resolve.

Learn more

Type a term, or a word from its definition.⌘K opens this from any page.